 |
Time attack 850hp wrx |
 |
30th July 2009, 12:40 PM
|
#1
|
|
n00b
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 45
|
Time attack 850hp wrx
|
|
|
30th July 2009, 12:51 PM
|
#2
|
|
"formerly Reece"
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Burpengary
Posts: 1,004
|
 everyone loves a good gobby hahaha
if you dont understand the cars the gobbstopper.
2.0l ftw haha in this case anyway
Last edited by YUSLO : 30th July 2009 at 03:06 PM.
|
|
|
30th July 2009, 12:54 PM
|
#3
|
|
RSLC Wh0re
BIG POSTER
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hobart
Posts: 4,280
|
I think that is the one Rodger Clark build - Basically a 2000 model WRCar without engine restrictions.
Im pretty sure its a repost too.
|
|
|
30th July 2009, 12:58 PM
|
#4
|
|
bugged out back
Event Organiser
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VIC
Posts: 2,997
|
except it runs Nos and a gt35R
__________________
...Dave
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Venaii
markmcrs: You past me and Tim (Asian) in his SLOW car on the GOR cruise
|
|
|
|
30th July 2009, 01:09 PM
|
#5
|
|
Auspicious Prick!
BIG POSTER
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Gong
Posts: 3,827
|
Hot shi7 makin ya bounce. Nice
__________________
I'm Winston Wolfe. I solve problems.
My Ride: Here
|
|
|
30th July 2009, 01:20 PM
|
#6
|
|
Moderator
BIG POSTER
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,683
|
Yeah, been around for a while...
Roger Clark Motorsport, the "Gobstopper"
Mean bit of kit!
|
|
|
30th July 2009, 01:31 PM
|
#7
|
|
Moderator
BIG POSTER
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,683
|
Last edited by Nathan|RST| : 30th July 2009 at 01:55 PM.
|
|
|
30th July 2009, 02:25 PM
|
#8
|
|
RSLC Wh0re
BIG POSTER
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NSW - Central Coast
Posts: 7,028

|
Quad fuel rails and twin FPRs for MAXIMUM POWAAAAAAHSS!!!!111one
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ||BiG-ReD-CaR||
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by axle
Had an angry the other night and it was a sloppy disappointing experience.
|
sounds like a night with DJA
|
|
|
|
30th July 2009, 02:54 PM
|
#9
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 395
|
nice flocking dash 
|
|
|
31st July 2009, 09:24 AM
|
#10
|
|
Large member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 600
|
Has anyone got the link to another forum with the build thread for this car i can remember someone posting it last time...
|
|
|
31st July 2009, 11:24 AM
|
#11
|
|
RSLC Wh0re
BIG POSTER
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hobart
Posts: 4,280
|
|
|
|
31st July 2009, 11:38 AM
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hilltop NSW
Posts: 2,400
|
All i can say is how much of a bag of fun would this thing be to drive!!
|
|
|
31st July 2009, 01:21 PM
|
#13
|
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 218
|
I like the fact they've kept a few things simple like just kept the standard pedals (no pedal box), and Master Brake and clutch cylinders. Still looks a bit street, even still runs a "standard?" intake manifold.
That sump dosen't look too hard to knock up Al especially after that V8 intake you did!!!!!
|
|
|
31st July 2009, 10:05 PM
|
#14
|
|
Getting there
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tas
Posts: 1,085
|
same intake setup as mine but his has an extra idler, nice
__________________
if its not broken... break it
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
1st August 2009, 12:20 AM
|
#15
|
|
RSLC Wh0re
Event Organiser
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: S-Technic garage
Posts: 4,724
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fatcat67
I like the fact they've kept a few things simple like just kept the standard pedals (no pedal box), and Master Brake and clutch cylinders. Still looks a bit street, even still runs a "standard?" intake manifold.
That sump dosen't look too hard to knock up Al especially after that V8 intake you did!!!!!
|
Indeed. It's much closer to what a DIY effort would be than a full on WRC of the era. Standard crossmembers, hubs and front control arms for instance. I think it uses a KAPS 6 speed as well perhaps? Massive cost to go the WRC items for minimal benefit. Even the cage looks fairly minimal in comparison. I like the concept of it. Powerful and light, purposeful yet not money's no object World Championship car. Even with 400 horsepowers it would be dynamite! 
__________________
"This country you gotta make the money first. Then when you get the money, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the woman"
|
|
|
 |
1st August 2009, 01:34 AM
|
#16
|
|
RSLC Wh0re
BIG POSTER
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hobart
Posts: 4,280
|
Gearbox is stock subaru 6 speed with Modena gear set with dogs and sequential selection adaption.
For the strength that this box obviously has for what would costs about $20,000, I cant really understand how a WRCar gear box is worth $50,000 or more?
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
1st August 2009, 11:54 AM
|
#17
|
|
RSLC Wh0re
Event Organiser
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: S-Technic garage
Posts: 4,724
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by grug
Gearbox is stock subaru 6 speed with Modena gear set with dogs and sequential selection adaption.
For the strength that this box obviously has for what would costs about $20,000, I cant really understand how a WRCar gear box is worth $50,000 or more?
|
1) It's homologated for WRC (the Modena isn't)
2) It's magnesuim case, therefore lighter.
3) It's a different design that does away with the transfer gears and runs the tailshaft direction reversed, therefore lighter and simpler.
4) It's eletcro-pneumatically shifted.
5) Active diffs (until they were outlawed)
But yes, I agree that it's perfectly suitable for the application, and thousands cheaper. Personally I'm not a believer in H pattern boxes that are converted to sequential unless it's done like the KAPS (with a whole new purpose designed rear housing). I'd live with the Modena Doggy and H pattern for reliability.
__________________
"This country you gotta make the money first. Then when you get the money, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the woman"
|
|
|
 |
1st August 2009, 12:23 PM
|
#18
|
|
RSLC Wh0re
BIG POSTER
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hobart
Posts: 4,280
|
I would have thought it would have been in the WRCs best interest, when they were looking to cut costs before everyone packed up ship and left, to make it mandatory that gearboxes were required to use the stock casing with stronger gearing. Sure, its not the absolute best design idea but it would do the job and save a shit load of money in equipment and especially research and development.
Oh well, too late now.
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
1st August 2009, 04:19 PM
|
#19
|
|
RSLC Wh0re
Event Organiser
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: S-Technic garage
Posts: 4,724
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by grug
I would have thought it would have been in the WRCs best interest, when they were looking to cut costs before everyone packed up ship and left, to make it mandatory that gearboxes were required to use the stock casing with stronger gearing. Sure, its not the absolute best design idea but it would do the job and save a shit load of money in equipment and especially research and development.
Oh well, too late now.
|
That's where Group 'N' has finally got to after many years of wasting money breaking stock gears. I cannot understand why group N still has to use a 32mm restrictor, they should be allowed at least the 34mm that WRC uses, or open the turbo to standard dimensions but use genuine pump fuel. ie; 98 or 100 ron, not $7 a litre 'pump' fuel they use now.
__________________
"This country you gotta make the money first. Then when you get the money, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the woman"
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
1st August 2009, 05:42 PM
|
#20
|
|
Moderator
BIG POSTER
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Launceston
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fatcat67
I like the fact they've kept a few things simple like just kept the standard pedals (no pedal box), and Master Brake and clutch cylinders.
|
Umm... those photos are very old...
These are more up to date...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fatcat67
Still looks a bit street, even still runs a "standard?" intake manifold.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by moley
same intake setup as mine but his has an extra idler, nice
|
Umm... no fellas, thats a magnesium WRC manifold, certainly not a stock item...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dtrally
Indeed. It's much closer to what a DIY effort would be than a full on WRC of the era. Standard crossmembers, hubs and front control arms for instance. I think it uses a KAPS 6 speed as well perhaps? Massive cost to go the WRC items for minimal benefit. Even the cage looks fairly minimal in comparison. I like the concept of it. Powerful and light, purposeful yet not money's no object World Championship car. Even with 400 horsepowers it would be dynamite! 
|
Umm... They've changed things a little since those first photos were taken. I'd love to have these crossmembers and hubs as stock but I don't think it's going to happen any time soon...
Rear end is WRC spec

__________________
"Racing cars which have been converted for road use never really work. It's like making a hard core adult film, and then editing it so that it can be shown in British hotels. You'd just end up with a sort of half hour close up of some bloke's sweaty face." - Jeremy Clarkson
|
|
|
 |
1st August 2009, 06:21 PM
|
#21
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 211
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
1st August 2009, 07:02 PM
|
#22
|
|
RSLC Wh0re
BIG POSTER
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hobart
Posts: 4,280
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dtrally
That's where Group 'N' has finally got to after many years of wasting money breaking stock gears. I cannot understand why group N still has to use a 32mm restrictor, they should be allowed at least the 34mm that WRC uses, or open the turbo to standard dimensions but use genuine pump fuel. ie; 98 or 100 ron, not $7 a litre 'pump' fuel they use now.
|
I agree on the use of pump fuel. In all seriousness, if they (being the FIA) want people who have talent but not huge budgets to get into rallying then they need to seriously look at some of the bullshit regulations they have in place.
Pump fuel even at today's prices could be had for less than a quarter of what competitors 'have' to pay for regulation fuel. Thats a massive financial difference.
If power output is an issue, do as you say, increase the turbo restrictor size.
Perhaps only allow front and rear off the shelf strut braces, ban seam welding or chassis modifications of any sort and put the emphasis on the manufacturer to deliberately incorporate stronger chassis into their cars if they wish to remain competitive in motor spot.
IMO, that would save a lot of money in car preparation.
At the end of the day, the every day joe can build a car for quite a lot less than a group N rally car is 'worth' (being about $200k if I remember rightly for an '09 subaru) and get quite close, if not better performance. Hell, you could build an RS Turbo up with a STi donk, 6 speed, decent turbo, Link/motec, sway bars, braces, coil overs, plated diffs for under 20k and be highly competitive in a national rally - if you were allowed certain liberty's.
/ off thread topic, but meh...
|
|
|
 |
1st August 2009, 07:12 PM
|
#23
|
|
Getting there
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tas
Posts: 1,085
|
Umm... no fellas, thats a magnesium WRC manifold, certainly not a stock item...
haha meant designed the same way, im not loaded..
__________________
if its not broken... break it
|
|
|
1st August 2009, 07:18 PM
|
#24
|
|
Moderator
BIG POSTER
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,683
|
Last edited by Nathan|RST| : 1st August 2009 at 07:24 PM.
|
|
|
1st August 2009, 08:29 PM
|
#25
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 211
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +11. The time now is 04:22 AM. |
|
|
|